Time Now 2025

I’ve stopped publishing new material on Time Now, but the posts remain available and in fact still attract a fair amount of readers, thank you very much. On the other hand, the Time Now Twitter/X site has recently been shut down by the site administrators for reasons unexplained to me. I hadn’t been posting on it much recently, so don’t really miss it, but I did notice earlier this year that a woman named Katie Miller, whose bio at the time read “proud member of the DOGE team,” had followed me. The name didn’t mean anything to me, but the bio seemed curious, if not ominous, and then in the wake of recent news that I learned that Katie Miller is the wife of Presidential advisor Stephen Miller, and that she has apparently run off with Elon Musk. I don’t think the marital kerfuffle or the connections to the Trump administration have anything to do with my X account being shut down because I hadn’t made any political or topical posts, but who knows?

I’ve migrated social media announcements to Bluesky, but only to post in chronological order links to all my Time Now posts, beginning back in 2012. I’m not sure what I hope to accomplish by doing this, but if a link to a Time Now post of yore might be a welcome addition to your daily scrolling, consider giving me a follow. As I write, no one has yet followed or liked me, so there’s still a chance you can be my #1 fan.

Look for me at “TimeNowEncore” at petermolin.bsky.social

I still keep an eye on new publications and goings-on related to GWOT literary writing, film, and art. In particular, I’ve been tracking publication of academic writing on the subject and reading as much of it as I can get my hands on. I’m flattered to see Time Now mentioned favorably enough in some of the works and suspect/hope that much of the traffic Time Now gets now is the work of grad students and literature professors toiling away on dissertations and books on GWOT writing and art.

So, as a finder’s aid for graduate students and scholars, below’s a list of the full-length scholarly books in which GWOT fiction and memoir is central.

1. Kate McLoughin, Authoring War: The Literary Representation of War from the Iliad to Iraq (2011). Cambridge University Press.

2. Stacey Peebles, Welcome to the Suck: Narrating the Soldier’s Experience in Iraq (2011). Cornell UP.

3. Ikram Masmoudi, War and Occupation in Iraqi Fiction (2015). Edinburgh University Press.

4. David A. Buchanan, Going Scapegoat: Post-9/11 War Literature, Language and Culture (2016). McFarland and Company.

5. Owen Gilman, The Hell of War Comes Home: Imaginative Texts from the Conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq (2018). University Press of Mississippi.

6. Caleb S. Cage, War Narratives: Shaping Beliefs, Blurring Truths in the Middle East (2019). Texas A&M University Press.

7. Joseph Darda, Empire of Defense: Race and the Cultural Politics of Permanent War (2019). University of Chicago Press.

8. Roy Scranton, Total Mobilization: World War II and American Literature (2019). University of Chicago Press.

9. Mary Douglas Vavrus, Postfeminist War: Women in the Media-Military-Industrial Complex (2019). Rutgers University Press.

10. Purnima Bose, Intervention Narratives: Afghanistan, the United States, and the Global War on Terror (2020). Rutgers University Press.

11. Myra Mendible, American War Stories: Veteran-Writers and the Politics of Memoir (2021). University of Massachusetts Press.

12. Joshua Pederson, Sin Sick: Moral Injury in War and Literature (2021). Cornell University Press.

13. Travis L. Martin, War & Homecoming: Veteran Identity and the Post-9/11 Generation (2022). University Press of Kentucky.

14. David E. Eisler, Writing Wars: Authorship and American War Fiction, WWI to Present (2022). University of Iowa Press

15. Gregory Brazeal, The Hero and the Victim: Narratives of Criminality in Iraq War Fiction (2024). Lever Press.

Readers with access to a university library might also look-up Angelo Arminio’s unpublished dissertation On the Frontlines of Fiction: Authority and Fictionality in American Veteran Narratives of the War on Terror (2024). I have read it and it’s excellent.

Let me know if I’m missing a title and I’ll add it. Somewhat curiously, stand-alone studies of film and poetry associated with the 9/11 wars seem not yet to exist (though several films are mentioned in passing in the above-named works). I’m also currently compiling a “must-read” list of scholarly and popular press articles that are frequently cited in scholarly books about GWOT art and literature–when I’m done I’ll attach it here.

Veterans Day Speech, 2024

I was invited to give a Veterans Day speech this year at a high school where my friend B___ (also a veteran) teaches. I have never given such a speech before, but I accepted the offer quickly not just out of friendship with B __, but because I was curious to see what the opportunity inspired me to say and how it would go over. The audience was upwards of 500 students and faculty, and as I spoke I couldn’t tell how I was faring, but upon conclusion the audience rose and gave me a long standing ovation, which I didn’t see coming and which moved me enormously.

Below’s the speech, for anyone who is interested. It’s ten-minutes long and tempered for an audience of high-schoolers with little exposure to the military, so not all that I think and could say about the subject. I’ve also resisted the urge to tidy it up after-the-fact or revise it to include all the great lines I wish I had written beforehand but didn’t think of in time.

****

Hello everyone, and thank you for inviting me to speak at P___’s Veterans Day ceremony. This is my third visit to P___, all courtesy of B___, and everything I’ve seen has really impressed me. The facilities, the sense of community, the commitment to excellence, and the quality of the faculty and most of all the quality of students strike me as exceptional.

In the time given me, I hope most of all not to bore you. I want to say something original and hopefully entertaining, or at least interesting, about what it means to be a military veteran and how you might honor veterans on the day given to their celebration.

That’s not exactly easy, since the import of Veterans Day is well-established and not hard to understand: the nation has decided that it is right to dedicate at least one day of the year to honoring the men and women who have volunteered to serve in the Armed Forces. Though not all veterans have fought in war, all have chosen to step out of the normal paths of American life at least for a few years to defend the country and, if asked, put themselves in harm’s way. And then, when those few years are done, to become veterans, a new-found identity they will bear with them the rest of their lives.

For me, I became a veteran in January, 2015. For the previous 28 years I had woken up in the morning as a member of the Army, and now I didn’t. For 28 years my wife and two sons had known me as an Army officer, now I wasn’t that anymore, but it wasn’t clear what or who I would now be. For the previous 28 years, the horizon of my life was the next unit, the next deployment, the next promotion. Now, the future was uncertain, and rather than being given to me, it had to be created by myself.

It is this transition from the Army culture and system to that of civilian that is difficult and which turns former military members into veterans.

At first, my new-found identity as a veteran did not feel comfortable. The label felt awkward like a new suit I was not yet used to. For me the publicly visible veterans I knew and saw were old men who had fought in World War II, Korea, and Vietnam. They wore ball caps with unit insignias on them, and often old fatigue jackets. They seemed to care a lot about memorials in Washington, DC, and parades on Veterans Day.

Honestly they seemed to be eager for recognition and approval, which was the exact opposite of how I felt I in January 2015. I wanted to distance myself from my military identity as quickly as possible. I didn’t want to be thanked for my service. I didn’t want to deal with the Veterans Administration. I didn’t want to march in parades and stand up and be recognized at sports events. I didn’t associate much with other vets, nor did I seek employment that traded on my veteran identity. I put the uniform I’m wearing now in the closet and never brought it out for years.

Why was this? Was I ashamed? Did I have regrets? Did I feel like I was tainted by having lived for so long in an organization and culture that was far too familiar, even comfortable with violence and the use of force and the rigid stratification of military hierarchy? Or, was I excited about new possibilities and new ventures? I think most of all I was unsure of how to be a vet. I didn’t know how to manage my thoughts, or the presentation of myself. I worried that I might actually seem too proud of my veteran identity?  I was afraid of coming on too strong to civilians, and so I probably overcorrected by suppressing my veteran status and characteristics.

In time, I have become much more comfortable about being a veteran. The transition was enabled by my developing sense of how the military informed me in a positive way, and that the positive attributes of being a military member could carry over into the civilian world. One thing that helped the process was learning to interact casually with civilians—to put them at ease while also defusing anxiety on my part.

Beyond the official hullabloo of honoring veterans on Veteran’s Day is an underlying sentiment of saying, “Thank you for your service.” That sentiment, even as sincerely rendered, can seem inadequate to both service-members and the people saying it. It seems a little undernourished, even trite, incapable of opening up the full range of things that might be expressed. Some veterans report actively disliking being told that. What underlies the discomfort?

From a veteran’s perspective, the idea of being “thanked” doesn’t seem like enough, or even the point. Veterans join the military voluntarily, and they often do so for the pay and the benefits or other personal reasons. When I joined, swirling in my head were the chances for a work-life spent outdoors and dedicated to vigorous physical exercise. Many soldiers join because of familiarity with the military based on having family members already in; it may be something of a family tradition to serve. Some join to get out of unwelcome hometown and family situations—that happens. Others are curious about the chance to experience a life and culture very much outside the typical and “normal” life patterns available to young Americans. That idea honestly was prominent in my own initial decision to join.

The idea of “service” lurked deeper in my awareness. In my mind, for example, was a vague notion that if one loved their country one should “serve” their country, and as a young person with not much to offer, willingness to do so through physically demanding and perhaps dangerous endeavor was appealing. Even as I thought that, though, it was clear to me that there are many ways to serve the country; for example, service is embedded in the idea and actuality of going to school, getting an education, and finding a job or career: we are all in one way or not serving in ways that contribute to a better community and nation. And so, the idea that I should be thanked for joining didn’t cross my mind and would have felt strange if someone had broached it. To me, I was thankful that such an opportunity that married so nicely with my own interests and desires existed. And so, I often respond to the expression of saying, “Thank YOU for supporting me,” or “Thank YOU for YOUR service.”

Still, “Thank you for your service” is the phrase we have, and I try not to be critical or overly analytical about it. But built into the conundrum of “Thank you for your service” is the difficulty of understanding what else might be said, or what might be said next. At heart, is the idea that any further questions might take the conversation to a dark place or an overheated political place. Not more really needs to be said, in many or most cases, but here are some ideas that balance tact with sincere curiosity.

First off, ask a veteran what branch of the military they were in—Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, or Coast Guard—and why they joined. For me, it was the Army, because it seemed the most representative of American history and experience. Just as much, I wanted to go to Ranger School, which only the Army offered.

Ask a veteran WHERE he or she served. There’s not a lot of judgment involved in such a question, and as the military rarely fails in sending service members to interesting or exotic places and veterans generally like to recount their travelogues. For me, I would say, lots of places: Missouri, Georgia, North Carolina, Kansas, New York, and New Jersey in the United States, and Korea, Panama, Egypt, Kosovo, and Afghanistan overseas. You might then say, “Which one did you like best? Or, “What was such-and-such a place like?” It’s an expression of curiosity and personal interest, and you are likely to get an interesting response tempered to be light or even amusing. The veteran may be moved to tell you about a place he or she didn’t like, but rarely will the veteran use such a prompt to make you feel uncomfortable.

Or, you might ask, “What did you do?” Most veterans will take this as a question about their job, and will reply in terms in regard to what is known as their “Military Occupational Specialty.” In the Army that can range from infantry to cook to medic to tanker to truck driver to administrative clerk. The other branches have an equally wide range of jobs, many of them more exciting than anything the Army offers. Again, a simple, “How was that?” will probably elicit a good-natured anecdote or two. It’s a light, friendly gambit, but you will learn something, and the veteran will use it to measure whether the time and place is right to burden you with anything too detailed or heavier, which he or she will probably decide it is not. But the groundwork has been laid for such a conversation in the future, if the situation is right.

Lurking behind these opening pleasantries are more profound questions, chief among them “Did you see combat?” and its evil twin, “Did you kill anyone?” The “Did you see combat?” question is natural. If the veteran did see combat, the answer is likely to be, “Yes, a little,” or “Yes, a lot” and honestly will probably want to leave it at that. If the veteran did not see combat, the answer will be “No, I never did” or maybe “Thank God, I never did” and similarly, leave it at that for the time being. I don’t recommend asking the “Did you kill anyone?” question, though, frankly, it is often asked, especially by young people. If the answer is “no,” the veteran is apt to shrug it off, perhaps with a laugh, and say, “No, I never had to do that.” If the answer is “yes,” the conversation has reached a difficult place. The answer is likely to be measured, as the veteran weighs the tone and amount of detail the response requires. For me, the answer would be, “No I never personally did, but the soldiers I led certainly did, and I gave the orders that sent them into battle.” If the next question is “How did you feel about it then and how do you feel about it now?” my answer would be, “The situation demanded it: it was kill or be killed, and I would have given any order required to protect my soldiers while also ensuring they could live with themselves afterward.”

And so, now we are on to the larger, consequential questions concerning politics and morality. The rules of civil adult-to-adult conversation now apply, and the groundwork has been done that the veteran is likely to feel comfortable expressing their views. The talk is likely to go anywhere and so be it, as long as the spirit of respect and care apply.

You might also ask the veteran questions related to being a veteran, such as:

“What are you doing now?” Me, I’m teaching, which I see as on a continuum with military service. The transition was aided by becoming a teacher. Teaching, in its ideal form and aspirations, is far different than being in the military, of course.  But the military ethos also values near constant education, training, and instruction, the continual effort to master new skills and monitor and supervise the development of those skills in subordinates. In teaching I found the same sense of commitment to improvement that is a hallmark of the military. In joining the ranks of teachers at R____, I found the same sense of pride in belonging to and contributing to a top-notch institution as I did in the best military units I belonged to. I am sure this is true of B____, too.

“What did you learn in the military that is helpful to you now?” Lots of things, but most of all an instinctual or reflexive commitment to team and organizational success. A perceptive civilian friend once told me that the quality she recognizes instantly in veterans is their quickness, as she put it, to say “yes to the group.” By this she meant that veterans are not subservient dupes to group think and leadership authority. Rather, they are quick to recognize that group efforts require enthusiastic buy-in from group members. Veterans, trained to think first of the needs of the unit and mission, she said, rarely hesitate or hold-out. Rather they quickly try to figure out how they can contribute to the success of the group project and the team mission. I trust you recognize this quality in B___, and I hope it’s true for me, too.

“What did you like best about the military?” For me, I often say the military never reneged on its promise of travel, adventure, and camaraderie, and that’s what kept me in for 28 years. I can also say that I never had a bad boss, or at least a really bad one. Rather, the opposite: my bosses mostly struck me as talented-and-good men and women trying their best to accomplish missions, take care of their soldiers, and uphold Army ideals. The same was true of the overwhelming majority of my fellow officers and soldiers. And far from being drags to be around, my bosses were often colorful and inspirational. They made missions seem worth doing by providing purpose and guidance, and as best they could given the circumstances (not always possible) fun, entertaining, or at least interesting. I’ll bet that’s true of B____ as well.

I know there are exceptions to these ideals, and the exceptions bring unwanted attention to veterans and the military. But exceptions are not the rule, and my first and abiding impression of anyone who has served is that he or she really really really wants to do the right thing in the right way. I think that sentiment is felt by most members of the general public and it underlies the spirit of Veterans Day and “Thank You for Your Service.” I’ll leave it at that for now. I hope I have rendered a sense of what it’s like for at least one veteran, and if you trust me, a lot more as well. Thank you for thanking me for my service, and thank you for everything you do, all of you, every day. Go P___!

Strike Through the Mask! #12

My February column for The Wrath-Bearing Tree is titled “The Clock Strikes Twelve.” As the title suggests, it is the last of twelve columns I signed on to write beginning in March 2023. It’s been a pleasure and honor, but it’s now time to move on to other writing and life ventures. Thank you for reading Strike Through the Mask!, and thank you Wrath-Bearing Tree.

“The Clock Strikes Twelve”

Strike Through the Mask! #11

This month for The Wrath-Bearing Tree, I’ve created a 30-question quiz covering the war-writing scene I’ve followed closely here on Time Now. The quiz is meant to be light-hearted, so have some fun with it, but my hope is that it also serves as a historical record of many of the major authors and fiction, poetry, and memoirs that have marked post-9/11 / GWOT writing.

The Great Contemporary War-Writing Quiz

2023 H-Net and Strategy Bridge Book Reviews

This year, in addition to my monthly Wrath-Bearing Tree column Strike Through the Mask!, I’ve published two book reviews in reputable online sources. 

For the H-Net “H-War” historians’ book-review compendium I reviewed Christopher Hull’s Our Man Down in Havana: The Story Behind Graham Greene’s Cold War Spy Novel.

For Strategy Bridge, a security-and-defense journal, I reviewed John W. Lemza’s The Big Picture: The Cold War on the Small Screen.

The two reviews were of books outside the normal scope of Time Now, but I’m flattered the editors sought me out and I enjoyed reading and thinking about the two books’ subjects. Both books described the intersection of art-and-entertainment creations with real-world Cold War security concerns. That’s my interest in 21st-century art, film, and literature about the Global War on Terror, as well, so the overlaps and underlaps between the two eras was interesting to contemplate.

Gve the two reviews a read, please, and stay tuned for more Wrath-Bearing Tree columns. I’ve got some fun planned for the January and February posts. 

Strike Through the Mask! #10

This month for The Wrath-Bearing Tree I offer three vignettes drawn from soldier and Marine memoirs about fighting in the Korengal Valley in Afghanistan and Fallujah in Iraq. The three vignettes are titled “The Powerless Lieutenant,” “Former Friend, Now a Foe,” and “Death in a Minaret.”

The Wrath-Bearing Tree, “Three Vignettes”

Strike Through the Mask! #9

This month for The Wrath-Bearing Tree my column is called Fallujah-Korengal/Korengal-Fallujah. In it, I explore how books and movies about the two GWOT battlegrounds mentioned in the title don’t just describe events but help create a near-mythic aura. Check it out!

KVyFernqTB6dFp4aH2qHwA

Strike Through the Mask! #8

This month for The Wrath-Bearing Tree I write on two memoirs by service members who served in the same region of Afghanistan I did and at the same time. Between them, they describe my tour in very familiar ways.

Memory and Memoir in Afghanistan

Strike Through the Mask! #6

Derrida BiodegradableThis month for The Wrath-Bearing Tree I’ve written on a subject in which I’ve long been interested: the lifespan of public popularity and critical acclaim of newly-published books and movies in the days, weeks, months, and years after their release. Everyone has an informal sense of how these things go. Some books are acclaimed immediately, but their reputations fade over time. Others are unnoticed upon release, but gain popularity and acclaim in later years. Some are pronounced great early on and attain and maintain “classic” status afterwards. Sometimes an idea, or passage, or character contained in a prose-work or film retains resonance, even as the original work is more-or-less forgotten.

I think there should be a more formal way of analyzing these processes and phenomena. Maybe it’s been done, but I’ve got a PhD in English Literature and haven’t discovered THE study that systematically and structurally explains the cultural reception and historical reckoning of artworks.

In this month’s Strike Through the Mask! I explore the subject by considering GWOT literature and film using the concept of “cultural biodegradability” as proposed by the French proponent of “deconstruction” Jacques Derrida.

The column is subtitled “The Afterlife of Words and Deeds.” It’s a serious subject, but nonetheless one I hope you enjoy exploring along with me.